Author's tone in a critical passage is most likely:

## The reasoning When a passage is described as **critical**, it means the author is analyzing something with disapproval or pointing out flaws. Think of a Nigerian newspaper columnist criticizing government policies or a film reviewer pointing out weaknesses in a Nollywood movie. Critical writers use **sarcasm** (saying the opposite of what they mean to mock) or **skepticism** (doubting claims, questioning validity). These tones allow them to challenge ideas effectively. For example: "Oh, wonderful! Another promise we'll never see fulfilled" — that's sarcastic criticism. ## Why the wrong options tempt you **B) Joyful** — Criticism and joy are opposites. A critical author is finding fault, not celebrating. **C) Confused** — Confusion shows uncertainty. Critical writers are actually very clear about what they oppose; they're not lost or unsure. **D) Indifferent** — Someone indifferent doesn't care enough to criticize. Critical passages show strong engagement, not apathy. ## Quick takeaway **Critical = Finding Fault, so the tone must show disapproval.** Sarcasm and skepticism are the writer's weapons to attack ideas they disagree with.