Why the answer is B, and why the others tempt you.
**The reasoning**
Personification is a figure of speech where we give **human characteristics** to non-human things — animals, objects, ideas, or nature. The word itself is your clue: "person" + "ification" = making something like a person.
Examples:
- "The wind *whispered* through the trees" (wind can't literally whisper — that's human)
- "The sun *smiled* down on us" (the sun doesn't have emotions — humans do)
- "My alarm clock *yells* at me every morning" (clocks don't actually yell)
Notice we're always giving these non-human things abilities or emotions that belong to **people**.
**Why the wrong options tempt you**
- **A) Animal** — If you give animal traits to something, that's called *zoomorphism*, not personification
- **C) Plant** — Giving plant characteristics isn't a recognized literary device
- **D) Geometric** — This doesn't relate to figurative language at all
The confusion happens when you see personification used *on* animals (like "the dog laughed"), but we're still giving *human* traits, not animal ones.
**Quick takeaway**
Personification = **Person**ification — always making non-human things act like **people**.
Want this in Pidgin, Yoruba, Igbo or Hausa? Sign up free →
Practice more Literature in English questions
NECO Literature in English has thousands more questions like this — with AI explanations on every one.